Model comparison
Command R vs DeepSeek Coder 1.3B
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 45.2% for Command R and 29.6% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B.
Side by side
| Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 34.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 22.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 29.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 60.4% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R: 13.3 (#329), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 62.18 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 53.3% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 25.8 (#244), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 4.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 30.5 (#219), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 25.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 25.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.9 (#240), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.3 (#256), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.4 (#248), DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than DeepSeek Coder 1.3B?
Command R has enough public results to be ranked (#267); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Command R or DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9.