Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Qwen-14B
Qwen-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-14B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | 113.03 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 4.4% | 61.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | 84.4% |
| MMLU | 25.8% | 66.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Qwen-14B?
Qwen-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Qwen-14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.2 vs 31.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Qwen-14B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.