Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Wizardlm 13b

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 30.2.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index68.631.4
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked4410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding15471035
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts15351018
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math15061017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—
LMArena Expert1547—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1321—
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English15071034
LMArena Chinese15881023
LMArena French1514—
LMArena Russian1520—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following15371048

Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query15321054

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text15151077
LMArena Creative Writing15331091
LMArena Multi-Turn14991047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper