Model comparison

DBRX vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 41.8 to 14.9.

Side by side

DBRX and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
DBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderDatabricksAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.443.0
Released2024-03-272025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked2125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding11321440
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11131428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math11451440
Omni-MATH—46.7%
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert10761417
GPQA Diamond32.9%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10711407
LMArena Chinese10681460
LMArena French10961413
LMArena German10571417
LMArena Japanese9901395
LMArena Korean9931364
LMArena Russian10781404
LMArena Spanish10641435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11121389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11121403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text11191417
LMArena Creative Writing11041334
LMArena Multi-Turn11111416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper