Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 38.8 to 14.8.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1440 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1428 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1440 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1435 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1389 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1334 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1416 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.