Model comparison
DBRX vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1447 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.