Model comparison

Llama 2-13B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.0 to 29.8.

Side by side

Llama 2-13B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Llama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.643.0
Released2023-07-182025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked3225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding10621440

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10511428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench42.2%—
BIG-Bench Hard58.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index106.17—
HellaSwag80.7%—
LAMBADA76.5%—
PIQA80.8%—
WinoGrande72.8%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math10651440
Omni-MATH—46.7%
GSM8K36.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert10301417
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.3%—
BoolQ82.4%—
MMLU55.6%—
OpenBookQA57%—
TriviaQA79.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ScienceQA55.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10241407
LMArena Chinese10011460
LMArena French10441413
LMArena German10091417
LMArena Japanese8941395
LMArena Korean9531364
LMArena Russian10551404
LMArena Spanish10871435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10451389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10641403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text10841417
LMArena Creative Writing10471334
LMArena Multi-Turn10501416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-13B or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper