Model comparison
DBRX vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 33.6.
Side by side
| DBRX | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1417 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.