Model comparison
Gemma 2 27B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 10.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-06-24 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 2K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1211 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1198 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 47.9% | — |
| LMCA | 7.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.08 | — |
| LiveBench | 38.2% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1212 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 26.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 27.9% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1172 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 27.1% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1217 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1221 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1206 | 1375 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.1% | — |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1241 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1224 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Language | 32.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 27B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.