Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 14.8.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index29.541.7
Released2024-02-292026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4615

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding12641416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts12451396
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—2.6%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math12731417
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert12231386
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Muse Glimmer: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English12581384
LMArena Chinese12481412
LMArena Russian12801390
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following12481375
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query12591382

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text12621389
LMArena Creative Writing12351339
LMArena Multi-Turn12751399
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper