Model comparison
DBRX vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1455 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning DBRX leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1445 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1437 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1428 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1249 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1473 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1413 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | DBRX | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.