Model comparison

DBRX vs Grok-3 mini

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.0

Rank #307 Confirmed

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.3 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 90.9% for Grok-3 mini.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRX and Grok-3 mini specifications
DBRXGrok-3 mini
ProviderDatabricksxAI
Noometry Index29.041.0
Released2024-03-272025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Coding11321380
Aider Polyglot—49.3%
WeirdML—42.6%
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning DBRX leads

DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Hard Prompts11131374
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—16.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.35

Math Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Math11451386
MATH Level 511.7%90.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—77.8%
Omni-MATH—31.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.9%

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
GPQA Diamond32.9%76.3%
LMArena Expert10761395
MMLU-Pro—79.9%
Confabulations—10.8%
GPQA (HELM)—67.5%

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Non-English10711352
LMArena Chinese10681387
LMArena French10951357
LMArena German10571350
LMArena Japanese9901343
LMArena Korean9931336
LMArena Russian10781352
LMArena Spanish10641379

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Instruction Following11121356
IFEval—95.1%

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Longer Query11121372
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGrok-3 mini
LMArena Text11191370
LMArena Creative Writing11041342
LMArena Multi-Turn11111355
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.5%
WildBench—65.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Grok-3 mini share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper