Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Grok-3 mini
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.5 to 48.5.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 41.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1379 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1375 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1386 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1353 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1335 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1381 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1357 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
Long Context Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Grok-3 mini?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Grok-3 mini better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok-3 mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.