Model comparison

Command R vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 38.2.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Command RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderCohereStepFun
Noometry Index31.439.2
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding11691316
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts11641299
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math11551304
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert11381279
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English11741290
LMArena Chinese11821331
LMArena Russian11741324
LMArena French1162—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following11671287
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11981307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text11871321
LMArena Creative Writing11701328
LMArena Multi-Turn11631292
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper