Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 31.1.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderIBMStepFun
Noometry Index31.639.2
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding11121316
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts10921299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math11431304

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert10871279

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English10371290
LMArena Chinese10631331
LMArena Russian10601324

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following10881287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11221307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text10961321
LMArena Creative Writing10711328
LMArena Multi-Turn10631292

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper