Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.3 to 29.6.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1316 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | 1299 |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1304 |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1279 |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1324 |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1287 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.