Model comparison
Command R vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 31.0.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.