Model comparison

Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #270 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 28.2.
  • Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Qwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.839.5
Released2024-02-042026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1107—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1066—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.62

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1080—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1055—
MMLU62.6%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1140—
LMArena Russian1006—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1058—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1090—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1084—
LMArena Creative Writing1035—
LMArena Multi-Turn1061—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper