Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 28.2.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.