Model comparison

Command R vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads 50.8 to 38.2.

Side by side

Command R and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 specifications
Command RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.440.1
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked2910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Coding11691296
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Hard Prompts11641311
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Not comparable

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LiveBench Math19.4%—
LMArena Math1155—

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Expert1138—
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Non-English11741253
LMArena Chinese11821277
LMArena Russian11741269
LMArena French1162—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Instruction Following11671293
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Longer Query11981299

Writing & Preference Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Text11871308
LMArena Creative Writing11701288
LMArena Multi-Turn11631315
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R or Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better for coding?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper