Model comparison
Command R vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 38.2.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command R | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1460 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1434 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1445 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Is Command R or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.