Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 13.8.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index31.450.3
Released2024-08-302026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.87
Results tracked2919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11691534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11641512
CritPt—26.6%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11551494
ProofBench—70%
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11381543
MMLU65.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English11741474
LMArena Chinese11821529
LMArena Russian11741480
LMArena French1162—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11671493
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11981501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkCommand RMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text11871492
LMArena Creative Writing11701468
LMArena Multi-Turn11631464
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is Command R or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper