Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index31.650.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11121534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10921512
CritPt—26.6%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11431494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert10871543

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English10371474
LMArena Chinese10631529
LMArena Russian10601480

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10881493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11221501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text10961492
LMArena Creative Writing10711468
LMArena Multi-Turn10631464

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper