Model comparison

Command R vs Magistral Small

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

Magistral Small Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Small in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Magistral Small leads 37.8 to 28.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 61.3% for Magistral Small.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.

Side by side

Command R and Magistral Small specifications
Command RMagistral Small
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index31.029.9
Released2024-08-302025-06-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output4K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$1.50
Results tracked2910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Command R: 28.8 (#301), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
SciCode—35.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
LMArena Coding1170—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Command R leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
DTBench46.4%61.3%
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—6.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1164—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—133.19
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Too close to call

Command R: 25.8 (#244), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30%
LiveBench Math19.4%—
LMArena Math1155—

Knowledge Too close to call

Command R: 30.5 (#219), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert1138—
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R: 35.9 (#240), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
LMArena Non-English1174—
LMArena Chinese1182—
LMArena French1161—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1162—
LMArena Russian1174—
LMArena Spanish1150—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R: 58.3 (#256), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1167—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R: 36.3 (#226), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1198—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R: 38.4 (#248), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RMagistral Small
LMArena Text1187—
LMArena Creative Writing1170—
LMArena Multi-Turn1163—
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Magistral Small?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Magistral Small?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Command R or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Magistral Small share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper