Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Magistral Small
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 19.1 to 6.9.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | — |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1072 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Magistral Small?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.