Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mistral Small 3 leads 18.9 to 6.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 6.7% for Mistral Small 3.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • Magistral Small accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Magistral SmallMistral Small 3
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index30.231.2
Released2025-06-102025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K33K
Max output40K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.08
Results tracked1024

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
SciCode35.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Mistral Small 3 leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
Chess Puzzles3%0%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19127.07
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233
DTBench61.3%—

Math Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%6.7%
LMArena Math—1240

Knowledge Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond56.1%47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Small does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Mistral Small 3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper