Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs GLM-5V-Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 7.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 38.2.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command RGLM-5V-Turbo
ProviderCohereZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index31.443.8
Released2024-08-302026-04-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K200K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$4
Results tracked2919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Coding11691466
LMArena WebDev—1401
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts11641443
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Math11551441
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Expert11381452
MMLU65.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Vision—1264
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Non-English11741420
LMArena Chinese11821488
LMArena French11621444
LMArena German11761423
LMArena Korean11631396
LMArena Russian11741431
LMArena Spanish11511450
LMArena Japanese1143—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following11671423
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Longer Query11981438

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)

BenchmarkCommand RGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Text11871437
LMArena Creative Writing11701416
LMArena Multi-Turn11631432
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 7.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is Command R or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper