Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#270); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

35.0

Unranked Sparse

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 22.8% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and 29.3% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index35.031.6
Released2023-11-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%35.4%
LMArena Coding—1112
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1092
Epoch Capabilities Index63.6—
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math—1143
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1087
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1037
LMArena Chinese—1063
LMArena Russian—1060

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1088

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1122

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text—1096
LMArena Creative Writing—1071
LMArena Multi-Turn—1063

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#270); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper