Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
NVIDIASide by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1063 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.