Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 35.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index32.441.3
Released—2025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding11861443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11451420
CritPt—0%

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math11521396

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert11421425

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English10991392
LMArena Chinese11451462
LMArena Russian10921387
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11311392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11621409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text11501411
LMArena Creative Writing11291375
LMArena Multi-Turn11081404

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper