Model comparison
Codestral vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 35.0 to 26.9.
Side by side
| Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1223 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1204 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1179 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1201 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.