Model comparison

Codestral vs Deepseek Coder v2

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Deepseek Coder v2 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.1 to 27.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.5% for Codestral and 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2.
  • Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Deepseek Coder v2 specifications
CodestralDeepseek Coder v2
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Noometry Index30.635.9
Released2024-05-292024-06-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%48.2%
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%59.7%
HumanEval+73.8%82.3%
MBPP+61.9%75.1%
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
LMArena Coding—1251
ALE-Bench137.78—

Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1207
WinoGrande—83.7%

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Math—1241
GSM8K—94.5%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Expert—1181
ARC (AI2) Challenge—64.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Non-English—1182
LMArena Chinese—1201
LMArena French—1185
LMArena German—1164
LMArena Japanese—1126
LMArena Korean—1104
LMArena Russian—1188
LMArena Spanish—1153

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Instruction Following—1180

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Longer Query—1219

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralDeepseek Coder v2
LMArena Text—1191
LMArena Creative Writing—1120
LMArena Multi-Turn—1177

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Deepseek Coder v2?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codestral or Deepseek Coder v2 better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Deepseek Coder v2 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Deepseek Coder v2 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper