Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.5 to 28.4.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 35.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1223 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1204 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1230 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1179 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1201 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1014 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.