Model comparison
Codestral vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads 33.9 to 26.9.
Side by side
| Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#235)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 21.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1174 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 31.3 (#196)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1195 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.6 (#241)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.6 (#241)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1174 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.9 (#240)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1154 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.