Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 33.4.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.