Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 Fast in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 51.0 to 24.8.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index33.741.4
Released—2025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena WebDev—1242
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1411
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—394.93
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts10521407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%
LMArena Math—1408

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%
LMArena Expert—1399

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English9921391
LMArena Chinese—1441
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following10241376

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query—1390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text10571408
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327
LMArena Multi-Turn—1389

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper