Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
TencentSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 48.9 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1374 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.