Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5V leads 44.6 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-4.5V share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.