Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs o1-mini
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 7 categories and o1-mini in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 8.8.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), o1-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1303 |
| LMArena French | — | 1293 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than o1-mini?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or o1-mini better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and o1-mini share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.