Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.5-9B
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 37.5.
- Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Qwen3.5-9B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 64K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.5-9B?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 8.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.
Is GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5-9B does, with 262K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.5-9B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.