Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs QwQ-32B
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and QwQ-32B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where QwQ-32B leads 72.6 to 51.9.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 44.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 54.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1333 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1324 |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1308 |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than QwQ-32B?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and QwQ-32B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.