Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 28.2.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 49.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1486 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.21 |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1483 |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | — | 1494 |
| LMArena German | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1457 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1437 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1485 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.