Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 38.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.4% for Llama 3.1-405B and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index30.749.9
Released2024-07-232026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked4237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding12911498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
Cybench7.5%—
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12691486
DTBench61.4%94.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75154.21
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math12811483
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
ProofBench—39%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert12431478
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English12481472
LMArena Chinese12421518
LMArena French12791494
LMArena German12521466
LMArena Japanese12081451
LMArena Korean11841458
LMArena Russian12651483
LMArena Spanish12601464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following12591457
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query12661462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text12841479
LMArena Creative Writing12621437
EQ-Bench Creative Writing8701927
LMArena Multi-Turn12971485
WildBench78.3%—
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper