Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.850.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding10461534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10321512
CritPt—26.6%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math10561494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English10111474
LMArena Chinese9761529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10281493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query10131501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text10661492
LMArena Creative Writing10321468
LMArena Multi-Turn10151464

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper