Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Codellama 34b Instruct
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 31.0.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1046 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 37.1% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 43.9% |
| MBPP+ | — | 56.3% |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1032 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1056 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Codellama 34b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Codellama 34b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1011 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 976 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1028 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1013 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Codellama 34b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1066 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1015 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Codellama 34b Instruct?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Codellama 34b Instruct better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Codellama 34b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Codellama 34b Instruct has 14.