Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiniMax-M2.1
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |
Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1397 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1397 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1400 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiniMax-M2.1?
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M2.1 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.