Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 55.6 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Codellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.838.9
Released—2025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding10461416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10321398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math10561394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
LMArena Expert—1396

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English10111372
LMArena Chinese9761433
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1337
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Russian—1370
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10281363

Long Context Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query10131379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text10661384
LMArena Creative Writing10321317
LMArena Multi-Turn10151378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper