Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.7

Rank #169 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 28.4.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index30.238.7
Released—2025-07-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked1427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Coding10461397
GSO—2.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Hard Prompts10321379
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43%
ForecastBench—59.2

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Math10561396
Omni-MATH—39.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%
LMArena Expert—1370

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English10111366
LMArena Chinese9761427
LMArena French—1399
LMArena German—1376
LMArena Japanese—1348
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Russian—1373
LMArena Spanish—1385

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following10281353
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query10141367

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text10661384
LMArena Creative Writing10321343
LMArena Multi-Turn10151371
WildBench—78.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GLM-4.5-Air share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper