Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Grok 3

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok 3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 3 leads 55.8 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Grok 3 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index30.839.9
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1340

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Coding10901432
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10731434
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.33

Math Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Math11171391
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Expert10641421
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Non-English10331410
LMArena Chinese10701448
LMArena Russian10451416
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Instruction Following10561409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Longer Query10701439
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGrok 3
LMArena Text10801426
LMArena Creative Writing10461414
LMArena Multi-Turn10531425
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Grok 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper