Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 48.5 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Codellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.840.0
Released—2026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding10461375
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts10321337

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math10561359

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert—1356

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English10111295
LMArena Chinese9761359
LMArena French—1366
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1238
LMArena Russian—1253
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following10281318

Long Context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query10131314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text10661327
LMArena Creative Writing10321254
LMArena Multi-Turn10151328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper