Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 33.5 to 13.9.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.338.1
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding12641314
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts12461299
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math12731298
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert12231289
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Too close to call

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English12581265
LMArena Chinese12481314
LMArena German12581231
LMArena Japanese12041207
LMArena Russian12801271
LMArena French1274—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following12481275
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query12591292

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text12621299
LMArena Creative Writing12351262
LMArena Multi-Turn12751299
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper